Article 1221

Title of the article

Constitutional federal process: essential characteristics and national-state characteristics (a comparative study) 

Authors

Aleksandr D. Gulyakov, Candidate of juridical sciences, associate professor, rector of Penza State University (40 Krasnaya street, Penza, Russia), rector@pnzgu.ru

Index UDK

341.213.4

DOI

10.21685/2072-3016-2021-2-1

Abstract

Background. In the era of global transformation, affecting the sphere of state building, the importance of complex, federal systems is increasing. To describe them, it is advisable to use unified approaches in the form of models, an important component of which is such a structural unit as the constitutional federal process. The purpose of the article is to develop the characteristics of the process of this type and compare its course in the leading federations of the world.
Materials and methods. The author uses materials from the constitutions of the world’s leading federations, and in a number of cases – and court decisions, which assess federal relations. The article is based on comparative legal and comparative state studies methods.
Results. The study of federations of the first settlement type (USA, Canada, Australia) indicates their complete or almost complete constitutional monism. In the adaptation of constitutional laws, court decisions played a certain role (and for the United States a leading role). At the same time, Canada demonstrates a paradoxical deviation in the course of its development from a centralized to a decentralized federation. For European federations (Switzerland, Austria, Germany), one or another version of constitutional pluralism is more characteristic. Switzerland experienced evolutionary constitutional transformations, while Austria and Germany were marked by an intermittent constitutional process. Switzerland was characterized by a gradual weakening of the original decentralization, Austria managed to maintain an initially centralized state, and Germany was predominantly characterized by a moderately centralized development vector. India, as the most successful postcolonial federation under constitutional monism, has managed to rely on its flexible use and strengthen highly centralized federal relations. A rigid, centralized vector of development was implemented in the Soviet-Russian model of federalism, and it was based on constitutional pluralism. In Soviet times, its foundation was Marxist ideology, in post-Soviet times, Eurasian identity.
Conclusions. Among the leading federations of the world, there is a significant multivariance of the constitutional federal process, which prompts researchers to abandon any pre-agreed dogmas about “right” or “wrong” federalism.

Key words

constitutional federative process; constitutions of federal states; judgments and federal relations; federalism in the USA, Canada and Australia; federalism in Switzerland, Austria and Germany; federalism in Russia; comparative federalism 

 Download PDF
References

1. Gulyakov A.D. Federalizm: mekhanizm vozniknoveniya i osnovnye napravleniya razvitiya: istoriko-gosudarstvovedcheskoe issledovanie = Federalism: the mechanism of origin and the main directions of development: historical and state studies. Moscow: RIOR, 2019:388. (In Russ.)
2. Zhidkov O.A. (ed.). Soedinennye Shtaty Ameriki. Konstitutsiya i zakonodatel'nye akty = The United States of America. Constitution and legislative acts. Moscow: Progress, 1993:769. (In Russ.)
3. Maxeiner J.R. United States Federalism: Harmony without Unity. Federalism and Legal Unification. A Comparative Empirical Invesyigations of Twenty Systems. New York; London: Springer, 2014:494.
4. Salomatin A.Yu. Verkhovnyy Sud SShA. Sudebnaya pravovaya politika ot Dzh. Dzheya do Dzh. Robertsa = United States Supreme Court. Judicial legal policy from J. Jay to J. Roberts. Moscow: RIOR: INFRA-M, 2013:142. (In Russ.)
5. Danilov S.Yu. Evolyutsiya kanadskogo federalizma = Evolution of Canadian federalism. Moscow, 2012:303. (In Russ.)
6. Mallory J.R. The Five Faces of Federalism. Canadian Federalism Myth of Reality. Toronto, 1971:55–56.
7. Ivshina I.N. Stanovlenie i razvitie kanadskogo federalizma = Formation and development of Canadian federalism. Kirov: Izd-vo VyatGGU, 2007:179. (In Russ.)
8. Mazurkova T.V. The Constitution and the Supreme Court of Canada: from the Court of Appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser.: Pravo = Bulletin of Moscow University. Series: Law. 2017;16(4):141–147. (In Russ.)
9. Skorobogatykh N.S. Vekhi konstitutsionnogo puti Avstralii (1788–2000 gg.) = Milestones in Australia’s constitutional path (1788–2000). Moscow, 2006:240. (In Russ.)
10. Tsyrempilova E.B.-M. Poryadok razgranicheniya kompetentsii mezhdu soyuzom i shtatami v Avstralii: konstitutsionno-pravovoe issledovanie: avtoref. kand. yurid. nauk = The procedure for the delineation of competence between the union and the states in Australia: a constitutional legal study: author’s abstract of dissertation to apply for the degree of the candidate of juridical sciences. Ekaterinburg, 2019:25. (In Russ.)
11. Fleiner T. The Current Situation of Federalism in Switzerland. Revista d’Estudis Autonomics Federalism. 2009:53.
12. Solomonova S.A. Swiss Federal Constitution of 1848. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Pravovedenie = University proceedings. Jurisprudence. 2005;3:167–181. (In Russ.)
13. Federal Constitution of the Swiss Confederation May 29, 1874. Sovremennye konstitutsii = Modern constitutions. Saint-Petersburg: PRAVO, 1905:317–352. (In Russ.)
14. Ritaine E.C., Papeil A.S. Federalism and Legal Unification in Switzerland. Federalism and Legal Unification. A Comparative Empirical Investigation of Twenty Systems. New York; London, 2014:424.
15. Avraamenko S.L. New Constitution of the Swiss Confederation. Law and modernity. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and law. 2001;7:77. (In Russ.)
16. Constitution of Switzerland (Swiss Confederation) of April 18, 1999. Konstitutsii gosudarstv Evropy: v 3 t. = Constitutions of European states: in 3 volumes. Moscow: Norma, 2001;1:824. (In Russ.)
17. Leksin I.V. Gosudarstvennoe ustroystvo federatsiy v sostave Evropeyskogo Soyuza = State structure of a federation within the European Union. Moscow: Forum: INFRA-M, 2004:272. (In Russ.)
18. Nevinskiy V.V. Evolution of the constitutional legislation of the Republic of Austria. Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal = Russian juridical journal. 2001;1:114–120.
(In Russ.)
19. Geymbukh N.G. Konstitutsionno-pravovoe voploshchenii idei nemetskogo edinstva = Constitutional and legal embodiment of the idea of German unity. Tomsk: Veter, 2009: 204. (In Russ.)
20. Sayurov N.F. Mekhanizm gosudarstvennoy vlasti i upravleniya Federativnoy Respubliki Germanii = Mechanism of state power and administration of the Federal Republic of Germany. Lipetsk, 1997:153. (In Russ.)
21. Salomatin A.Yu., Makeeva N.V., Nakvakina E.V., Koryakina A.S., Miryaeva Zh.A. Etnicheskiy federalizm: entsiklopedicheskiy illyustrirovannyy slovar' = Ethnic federalism: an encyclopedic illustrated dictionary. Moscow: RIOR, 2020:301. (In Russ.)
22. Constitution of India, 1949. Available at: https//www.advocatekhoj.com/library/bareacts/ constitutionofindia/index.php?Title=Constitution%20of%20India,%201949 (accesseed 10.03.2021).
23. Basyrova A.N. India. Republic of India. Konstitutsii gosudarstv Azii: v 3 t. T. 2. Srednyaya Aziya i Indostan = Constitutions of the states of Asia: in 3 volumes. Volume 2. Central Asia and Hindustan. Moscow, 2010:1024. (In Russ.) 
24. Konstitutsionnoe (gosudarstvennoe) pravo zarubezhnykh stran: v 4 t. T. 4. Chast' osobennaya: strany Ameriki i Azii = Constitutional (state) law of foreign countries: in 4 volumes. Volume 4. The special part: the countries of America and Asia. Moscow, 2001: 656. (In Russ.)
25. Salikov M.S. (ed.). Etnichnost'. Kul'tura. Gosudarstvennost'. Problemy etnicheskogo federalizma v XXI veke = Ethnicity. Culture. Statehood. Problems of ethnic federalism in the 21st century. Ekaterinburg, 2014:183. (In Russ.)

 

Дата создания: 16.08.2021 08:44
Дата обновления: 16.08.2021 09:31